Utilitarian Arguments For Thesis Statement

Utilitarian Arguments For dissertation StatementFrom our pane of view, we agree that the procedures of women tolerate scalpel is non object lessonly justified. Therefore, spate piddle no repair to undergo scalpel counterbalance it is because of the steady demanded by society.Utilitarian Arguments for Thesis StatementUtilitarian approach has proven that the procedures of women undergoing scalpel is not morally justified. This is because harmonise to Act-Utilitarianism, an action is right solely if the action produces more than entertainment than disquiet for all parties. More important, it is not depending on the rules of morality that g everyplacen the action. We erectnot disclaim that scalpel can betray women prettier and more attractive. Therefore, it is definitely testament produce more pleasure than pain for the women. However, this situation is only happen in the diddle run. Let look into the long run, if more and more women are undergoing scalpel, it will affe ct the perceptions about beauty in society. This is because every unmatchable now is perfect alike a doll and women who not undergoing scalpel will automatically con rampred as ugly. As a result, every cardinal will stick a mindset that women must undergo scalpel then only can be considered a pretty woman. More everyplace, scalpel whitethorn lead to some(prenominal) side effects and health issues in the future. The side effects and health issues caused by scalpel may become a load to the women, her family as well as society. This is because the cost of these issues is mainly bear by the society. At that time, it is more pain than pleasure for everyone. This is because the consequences may not considerably be recovered and it is impossible to return to the original state.Health Risks We stick with the most obvious of risks. Call it reconstructive, cosmetic, or formativeit is still surgery. People have risked and lost their lives and limbs, and suffered devastating disfigurem ent and scarring as a result of plastic surgery gone wrong. The worst outcomes are rare, but risk is so far a reality.As quoted by (Natalie Kita, March 9,2009)By applying the Rule-utilitarianism, we have notice that another point of view that supports our thesis line. According to the Rule-utilitarianism, the action which kernel that follow the rules that general acceptance and produce the superlative balance of comfort is right. We all know that the outlook of one person is a get from God and we cannot overtake God to decide ones person outlook by undergoing scalpel. Although there are no rules and acts states that commonwealth undergo scalpel in take care of beauty is prohibited and il profound. The rules of general acceptance are that no one can overtake God to decide our outlook by undergoing scalpel. Therefore, scalpel is not morally justified action. If the society continues this trend of scalpel, it may urinate several negative consequences from health risks to psyc hological and social. The health risk may let in infection, tissue death, pneumonia, delayed healing and so on. The psychological and social risks may include the potential of inadequate of correction such as one may still feel ugly after scalpel. Based on the impacts, we can conclude that undergoing scalpel in anticipate of beauty will work more harm than good.Utilitarian Arguments for Antithesis StatementNowadays, social networks like Facebook has fundamentally changed the way tribe communicate and discover new liaisons. Many slew like to share their live with their friends or even a stranger. Therefore, these people start to demand a beauty appearing so that they can proudly share their photo or portrait online. In addition, people especially women start to level up their demand about beauty. They invariably want to become as pretty as some celebrity. Therefore, the only way for them to achieve this dream is by undergoing scalpel. For them, it is totally a moral justified behavior because they think that they have the right to decide their bear appearance in order to fulfill the wants as well as the demand of beauty by the society. By virtue of hedonism, women undergoing scalpel is nothing wrong. Hedonism is the surmise which emphasizes on pleasure and the absence of pain and therefore only the pleasure is ultimately good. For example, women can undergo scalpel in order to search for beauty appearance so that they can fulfill their dream and demand of the society. This is because a beauty appearance can brings pleasure to them.People from all over the world come to have their noses tweaked, chins thinned and fat removed and from time to time grafted onto another part of their face. Its not just a female thing males make up at least 30 percent of JK charge plate Surgery Clinics patients. JK Plastic Surgery Clinics foreign patients account for about 40 to 50 percent of the total number of patients. Of the foreign patients, Chinese make up about 70 percent.As quoted by (Violet Kim, August 9, 2012)This statement shows that it is morally justified and people have the right to undergo scalpel even a man. This is because scalpel is widely accepted all around the world and feature general acceptance from the society. In other words, nowadays, it is a pleasure to have a beautiful appearance after undergoing scalpel. Besides that, it is also sub judice for the doctor to help people undergo scalpel. Some countries like china and Korea even allowed doctor to advertise their profession and skills in scalpel and this mean it is legal and morally justified. According to Act-Utilitarianism, scalpel is right since it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the society. This is because beautiful appearance of one person can seduce happiness for themselves or even the people around them. Moreover, it also create job opportunities for doctor who running scalpel business. Finally, everyone is happy with this activity and th us it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for all parties.First, there is no specific biblical prohibition against changing the appearance of our physical bodies. Second, we do not consider other means to improve our outward appearance unethical. For example, few would argue that all forms of makeup, grooming, and fashionable clothing are per se immoral behaviors. In short, the freedom we have in Christ along with the guidance of our own conscience should lead us regarding behaviors that are not specifically prohibited. For this reason, I can capture no reason to find cosmetic surgery intrinsically immoral.As quoted from (Richard J. Poupard, 2010)This statement explains that scalpel is as prescript as grooming and fashionable clothing. Therefore, women undergo scalpel in order to search for beauty is a morally justified action. According to Rule-Utilitarianism, it is also right if it conform to a set of rules the general acceptances of which will produce the great est balance of pleasure over pain for everyone. For example, there are people who undergo scalpel to correct their skin which damaged by fire is a pleasure for them and their family as well.