Management & Leadership Essay

The way the conception now developed through the industrial revolution from the twentieth century has a large background with umpteen driving factor involved. The scheme that is cost-effective and has a beneficial force on social welf be of society, and those living in the society, is considerably qualified on the effective and resourceful piece of memorial tablets of all kinds, which depends on satisfactory or excellent commission and endureing potential, and which tooshie be learnt and extended, would be acknowledged by many.This is the reason varied government and government agencies across the nation or internationally, organization of all kinds, investing in their own development, be shake offs as the basis of this belief that they sterilise considerable investment in anxiety and drawing cardship training, development and education.There was a overlay in November 2006, bumpkin manager fix Garlingho practice session issued memo that manoeuverly gainsay the s enior perplexity. He accused the Yahoos guide lacking strategic direction. Their challenger Google had beaten Yahoo in bounds of revenue, advertisement and the sh ar price fallen nearly a third since the start of the year. He hinted to take a crap a change in their strategy.Off course it is very concentrated to change the strategy for any organization nevertheless to survive in the competent world a change should be made when needed. It was Mr. Garlinghouse great management and leading skill that he diagnosed the problem and gives his organization a direction to move. A vocalisation from what he observed and analyzed, the main part is that he made a decision to apply the change.He might have adopted different sprint for management as well as lead, according to the organisational structure of Yahoo, and would be aw are of what impact would be coming in applying the decisions. It would have been Autocratic or Paternalistic or it might be the Democratic star except what actually he identified was the lack in the management and leading directions.Waka outside(a) is a multinational organization making FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) all over the world and for the last few years making its way up but not with a pace with which it has to moving over with good management and leader but still the HR management asked junior researcher to compile a report on how the managers ordure lead their team up using different styles of management and leaders and how these styles going to impact on the strategic decision, and this is what good organization do to look what changes they need or things that can be adopted exchangeable Yahoo manager Brad Galinghouse did. There is a good asserting by some integrity that on that point is one thing constant and it is change and researchers have made efforts to govern forward some suggestion what style we should adopt in different sour situation within a team in Waka world(prenominal) to meet the challenges on different stages.Management is been described as the figure out of setting objectives and making most efficient use of financial, human and natural resources to strain these objectives, in which main task include readiness, organizing, concealling and coordinating.The resources whitethorn include the organizational assets which may be people, machinery, raw materials, information, skills and financial not bad(p) to measure the organizational performance i.e. how efficiently and effectively management use these resources to satisfy customers and to briefly explore or examine management and in this report will be looking on the management theories of 2 recent writers.First researcher tried to sketch the attempt of irradiation Drucker for his use to describe and comment upon what managers do and he identifies iii tasks congenial the goals or mission of the organization. Enabling the worker to contact and focus on productivity. Managing social responsibilities.He suggested in simplified manner that managers are necessitate to set objectives organize travel and communicate measure and develop people. secondly to mention the influential work on management of Henry Mintzberg in which he details his observations of what managers actually did. He examine that managers were not constitute to spend most of their period planning, organizing, coordinating, commanding and controlling and suggested ten procedures managers a lot attempt logically in the pursuit of their objectives and divided these roles in trinity stages as building relationship with the employees, yielding the prime(prenominal) information and finally the allocation of decision making, objective and resources to the employees.On the other hand lead can be suggested as, the part of management to drive the organization to succeed its goals by utilizing potential influence with group efforts. leaders in the organizational role involves establishing and sharing a fancy, providing inform ation, knowledge and methods to realize that vision so others can follow willingly.If we link management and leading we can say that leaders is an essential part of effective management, which emphasis upon the building an environment in which everyone has the opportunity to develop and excel skills. This link between management and leadership shows that managers must have traits of a leader.While learnedness to the highest degree leadership researcher describes two emblems of leadership which are Direct leadership & Indirect Leadership. Direct leadership is something about imposing orders to your pursual and by chance enforcing them to accept you as a leader, where followers used to test the leader regularly face-to-face. Or it can be said that the leaders who are able to get to know those they are working with and influence them on an interpersonal basis are direct leaders.While those having thousands of followers without possessing the role of leadership is the indirect leadership. It may in like manner be believed that the indirect leadership has to do with influencing others and making them your followers indirectly by inspiring the followers through your character, charisma etc. Leadership is not about persuasion people like subjects and taking it for granted its about presenting yourself as someone who people think should be followed for guidance. Its about kind the minds and hearts of people.If we like to differentiate between management and leadership we can come up with the idea that Managers perform roles in organizations and hold a specific, formal title and fulfill a role well Leaders aim to influence and guide others into pursuing particular objectives or ideas of the future and to motivate them into wanting to follow.In Waka International the management has the best quality leadership hence the reason, management asked their junior staff for such an strategic part to look on it, since the organization is willing to move up and each management is leading its team in a good way, with a good pace as well, in a break in management and leadership style.Leadership style is the way in which the functions of leadership are carries out, the way in which the manager typically behaves towards members of the group.Different leaders have different behavior which might produce different effects, so researchers began studies on successful leaders and began to develop different styles of leadership. Also how to expire a good leader one should be aware of his leadership style. There are many theories on leadership styles these are summarized into three dimensional theories which describe different leadership stylesThe concept in this style is of leader and followers, where leaders have got all the high power, authority and control they make the decisions in a one way communication and direct their followers with minimal participation of followers. All the planning and thinking is through with(p) by the leader and the teams role is to follow the orders and pauperization to the followers solo comes from the leaders status, charisma, expertise and power to remunerate and punish.An example of authoritarian styles is John F. Kennedy and one of the many things that John F. Kennedy is remembered for is his vision concerning the United States space program. On September 12, 1962, while speaking at Rice University, President Kennedy saidWe choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to winHe then went on to talk about metal alloys that had not yet been invented that are capable of standing heat energy and stresses several times to a greater extent than have ever been go through. He had a vision of sending a man to the moon an d back safely. He even explained how it was going to be accomplished. John F. Kennedy was exhibiting an authoritative leadership style that mobilized the resources of an entire nation towards this single goal.When we are talking about representative leadership, it does not refer to a leader who holds political office or background, such as senator or parliamentarian. It talks about a leadership style that exhibits democratic characteristics. This idea of leadership involves running a crinkle on the basis on the majority of decisions i.e. leader encourage the involvement of employees to take part in decision.Many of the great organizational leaders did use this style, Bill Gates is well known for his democratic management style at Microsoft. He actively involved employees in chance upon management and strategic decisions. He was always interacted with the employees of Microsoft and customer and devoted his time for them by staying in contact via e-mail.In the democratic leadershi p style, we see a balance in the decision-making process. Employees or followers are allowed to record in the decisions their opinion counts just as much as the leaders. Now this might sound like the optimal way to lead but every ways got some pros and cons in it.In this type of leadership managers observes that employees are working well on their own and consciously make a decision to pass to the member to allow them independence of action and not to interfere and is always available to help in need. The leader may also set some example but nobody has to follow it if they want to. They leader dont audition to motivate their subordinate or it can be said that need only comes from the fact that the single(a)s are free to do what they likes and no one has to waste time explaining their actions. This leadership style may work with individual people like academics and artists who need to be free on work in their own way, and dont like teamwork, they would like to like what they wa nt, and not ask for guidance or permission.Researchers suggested that a specific leadership style cannot be constraint to a particular situation rather any styles can be adopted at any situations. Researchers also suggested that the autocratic style may be suitable when large numbers pool of un-skilled employees are involved and when quick decisions are a matter of carriage and death and have to be made quickly. Motivation is just a name which comes out from the personality of the leader that is the reason followers manage to please or satisfy the leaders. So this style may be adopted when there is a need of urgency in Waka International and when a particular objective is achieved a different style can be implemented, and this is what management is all about, the change.Since in the democratic style, employees or followers have an equal say in the decision-making process, they are more dedicated to the desired outcome. The collaborative environment created by this style oft res ults in more comprehensive solutions to problems. If Waka International is looking for better(p) and yearn term result democratic style would be a better choice as most of the renowned company focus on the democratic style so it would be valuable for long term objectives and goals.Laissez-faire type of leader may inspire or motivate people or plan ideas but do not make any efforts to ensure that the team follows it. This kind of leadership can only work with academics or artists, who dont like team work and emphasis to work freely. So many researchers dont suggest adopting this style of leadership and it will not be driving the organization to its objective quickly. But this style is has good result if professional and experienced followers are in the workplace.From the report it can be cerebrate that management and leadership are two different aspects, but on a broad vision if leadership has not become the part of the management, this may lead to disastrous result. Coping up the resources and not leading in a good direction without an effective leadership may show short-term good result but it would not lay out a good impact on the organizational objective or goals and without the right leadership, organizational strategies will remain as ink on paper. Getting the right leadership to implement trading strategies takes careful planning and dedicated effort, and often substantial investment.Like the sports coach whose mediocre team never wins a championship, the CEO cant hope to achieve bold new strategies without giving thought to his leadership team and leadership culture. Too many organizations have become unworried with their existing leadership programs, instead of making certain that they are linking their leadership strategies and development investments with their product line strategies and taking full advantage of the learning opportunities that accompany strategic change.With learning and research it can also be concluded that the planning meth ods are useful in meeting the challenges of any situation and developing leadership skills. Leadership traits can be learnt and developed to meet the strategic require. This report has the relevance for handling complex situation of the present competitive business world by utilizing leadership skills in making strategic decisions to achieve the stipulated goal. The different styles mentioned earlier can be used depending upon the organizational needs and objectives, to achieve the goals.