Globalization: Toms a Commodity Fetish Essay

Globalization is the inter res publicaal crook, revision, and interaction within or amidst countries and or terra firmas. This forces an predilection of connectedness between the facilitating nation and the nation being influenced. Within this interaction and influence on an other nation in that location becomes this desire to become a trendsetter with with(predicate) the use of harvests and other confused commodities finishedout the earth. wholeness such example elicit be seen through and through the unite States which is associated with so numerous different eccentrics of crisscrosss such as Coca-Cola or Nike. These influences and trends though open firenot be simply placed anywhere, rather they be developed and strategic anyy thought of where they would be best placed and as well alternated to fit within a modernistic environment for optimum consumption. These changes can either hinder a product or can help it through the way in which it is advertised and accepted into the topical anaesthetic market.Such an example can be seen through TOMS brake shoe caller-out where their goal is to show how together, we can give a better tomorrow by taking compassionate action today (Toms.com). TOMS line of descent dumbfound of profane a pair natural spring a pair is marketed to the U.S. in a way that plays with peoples emotions so that their product becomes a fetish through the idea that once a pair of seat is bought people ar doing unplayful for another person in incident(a) nipperren in other countries without clothe. This correlates with both Marxs commodity fetish theory, the pagan imperialism theory and Mazz bellas idea of the doctor of imagery through the consent way TOMS is directed to the consumer and as well how on that point is an validatory influence from the TOMS shoe familiarity onto the other various countries that they take their shoe to through the autocratic imagery that is created through the world(a) allu de that the lodge is difficult to make.TOMS was started by founder Blake Mycoskie in 2006 after he had g bingle to genus Argentina in 2002 and saw the extreme poverty and wellness conditions and in routineicular children without blank space (toms.com). The original product came from an Argentine shoe called an alpargata which was worn by the local farmers in the expanse its a canvas or fabric material with rubber soles. Mycoskie took the alpargata to the U.S. scarcely changed and reinvented it for the American market so that there could be a product that made a tyrannical bear upon, which ultimately translates to the One for One campaign, where with every one pair of piazza bought another pair would be given to a child in necessity (toms.com). The reason for the out delve and communication channel of shoes is due to cardinal reasons first many children in impoverished places live in aras that sire unsafe terrains, such as a lack of unpaved roads. Second, there are a lso health concerns that are transmitted from the soil which is featd by not wearing shoes. finally TOMS did some research and found that many schools require children to wear shoes to the classroom and without shoes or until now the right color of shoes that child would not be concern to go into the classroom (Daniel20112). With this Mycoskie was able to start a business that now has manufacturing sites in China, Argentina, and Ethiopia (Daniel20114). These production factories are divided up into two departments where the Argentinean and Ethiopian factories are where the donated shoes are produced only and the China factory is where the shoes that go to the United States are produced (toms.com).Because TOMS is a private company essence that they are a business company owned either by non-governmental musical arrangements or by a relatively small number of shareholders or company members which does not offer or trade its company shares to the widely distributed public on th e stock market exchanges, but rather the companys stock is offered, owned and traded or exchanged privately (businessnow.com). This hence allows TOMS to be more private and less in the receptive or so what is way out on in their factories and other various production stages.However, TOMS is open about their manufacturing practices and according to the TOMS website they ensure that no children are working in the manufacturing process of their shoes. As well they hope to help their supply employees through training them and educating them in the knowledge of what human trafficking is and as well thralldom prevention. They follow local labor standards which fluctuate from place to place which gives a very vague reality of what their real standards are. TOMS website does say that all factories are audited by third parties, each employer signs a enroll of conduct in which they are agreeing to follow the stipulations to TOMS company, there are timed visits made by TOMS production staff to make sure they are working and adhering to the code of conduct and other various working standards, and that all their standards are ground off of the International Labor Organization Compliance Standards (toms.com).The intent of such standards, because, is to establish a worldwide minimum level of protection from cruel labor practices through the adoption and implementation of said measures. It is the aim of transnational labor standards to ensure the provision of such rights in the workplace, such as against workplace aggression, bullying, discrimination and gender inequality on the other work force for working diversity, workplace democracy and empowerment(ilo.org). The basic stages of the production of the shoes goes from a team that draws up the ideas of the shoes, to a mock make-up of the shoe, hence the design goes to the factories where they are made and because shipped to the U.S. where they are distributed to the various relaters and non-profit organization s that they better half with for shoe drops. Overall though, there is little information of the production stages and how the production facilities are like which causes concern seeing as how they fox built their image on doing rock-steady for others and want to have a positive advert on the local economies.It becomes important to acknowledge that TOMS is a for-profit company with giving at its core (toms.com). TOMS partners up with other various non-profit organizations that gallop parallel goals and standards as TOMS does. This then means that each non-profit organization that TOMS partners with necessitate to meet certain criteria. There are six requirements that the organizations need to foregather to be able to partner up with TOMS. First they need to have repeated giving which is where the potential organization must have the cogency to be active within the same communities on a mend basis throughout the years. Second they need to have high reach which means that t he organizations mission and goals need to support health and education in a fashion that underlies the principle of giving a child an hazard they normally would not have.Third enhancing impact through partnership, TOMS strives to make an influential impact in communities where they donate and the partnering organization ineluctably to have their mission and goals coincide with TOMS. Fourth, they need to be considerate of the local economy so that there is not a negative impact on the economy only a positive one. Fifth they need to be able to receive large shipments of TOMS shoes so that they may distribute the shoes to the places they focus on. Lastly, the potential partnering establishment needs to be comprehensively founded on health and education, so that the distribution of the new shoes not only supports TOMS mission but runs parallel with the establishments goals (toms.com). These non-profit organizations are not only an important aspect to the overall business of TOMS t hrough the king to give out the donated shoes but as well to pervade the word about TOMS to the various communities that they reach.Non-profit organizations play a key quality throughout the TOMS company process. Without these partnering organizations there would not be as stag shoe drops. These shoe drops are where the donated shoes are given to the children in the targeted area. Each organization plays a key role through going to different places that they see fit and in need of shoes. Even after the shoes have been delivered, TOMS continues to maintain relationships with its giving partners and the communities (toms.com). TOMS constantly monitors its partners for accountability. Additionally the organization recognizes that one pair of shoes is not going to last for the childs entire lifetime.Therefore, as the children grow out of their shoes or so every six monthsTOMS provides replacement shoes to these same children on a regular basis (Daniel20115). A schedule is set up wit h the identify community and local giving partner to maintain a regular Shoe Drop for the children. TOMS believes that repeat giving allows it to understand the locals needs more thoroughly. TOMS also works to adapt its products to account for the regions terrain, weather, and education requirements (toms.com). However, despite the use of these non-profit organization partnerships there is tranquillize a need to spread the word about what the TOMS company is all about and what they are trying to do.The TOMS company does not use unoriginal advertize in the sense that they use television or publisher ads rather they use social media to spread what they are doing through the various outlets such as viral videos, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Tumbler, and Youtube. Its approach has allowed TOMS to reach a abundant audience worldwide. TOMS maintains its own blog to educate the public about certain events in the company. Additionally, many consumers create their own digital content regar ding their experiences with TOMS spot. By encouraging events and word-of-mouth communication, TOMS is allowing consumers to do practically of the marketing for the company. There is a very strong need for participation from the consumers to spread the word and the idea behind TOMS so much so that they invite the consumer to be part of the movement (toms.com). The movement for TOMS is a wide range of various activities that the consumers can participate in from on campus programs, one day without shoes, and about importantly buying their shoes so that another pair can go to a child in need, in other words One for One.The images that are set uped in these pictures and information videos there becomes a very knock-down(a) image behind them. This coincides with Mazzarellas argument that the image is a stiff image and how that powerful image then is a created for a local identity on a particular product for each limited place. With TOMS there is a sense of creating a local identi ty through who the audience is but there is more of an idea that anyone can colligate in what they are about and doing no matter the age or stage of live one is in. Because, the TOMS Company is asking participation from the consumer they in essence are also asking them to create a essence behind their purchase and consumption of their shoe product this in turn causes the shoes to become fetishized. The shoes take on a new meaning for the consumer other than in effect(p) another pair of shoes. They become a symbol of hope, a chance for a child, a generous gift, and an opportunity for change for the consumer (cite).According to Marxs theory of the commodity fetish when an disapprove is treated as alive it becomes a fetish. As well Marx argues that capitalist economy produces its own fetishes through turning basic human needs such as food, warmth, shelter, and shoes into wants they try to seduce the consumer. The consumer does not think then of the use value the product just become s something that they want and more often than not the wants are very shallow (Marx). However, TOMS tries to put an anti-shallow want on their shoes through the use of playing with the consumers emotions. TOMS plays at the heart-strings of the consumer so that there becomes an turned on(p) link between the consumer and the product if the shoes are bought then a child is getting helped. As Marx points out there is an emotional quality in the product and this is often heightened through the way in which it is advertised. Even though TOMS does not use the conventional ways of advertising they do however, put a positive feeling into their information videos that provide and heighten this emotional affect.TOMS shoe company falls into this idea of a commodity fetish because TOMS is asking the consumer to fill in the space between the product and the means of it to fill in the gap according to Marx. TOMS makes its product seem so enticing for the consumer to do advantageously that ofte n measure it is forgotten that the company is a for-profit company and it almost gets seen as a non-profit company because of the way in which the company brings forth what it is trying to do. This in turn changes the meaning of the shoe from just a shoe into what the consumers want it to mean.The meaning of the product is not just individually made but socially created and functioning but the use value remains the same the meaning of the commodity is never locked down rather it is always change and fluxing with the social aspect and get filled with personal lives and not just the companies meaning (Marx). However, even though there is a positive reel on consuming TOMS shoes its important to look at how TOMS only releases certain information on what they are doing and their product they present everything that they do in a way that they are always doing good and nothing bad. This in turn ties in with Cultural Imperialism.Cultural Imperialism is the indirect influence of one cultur e onto another. It can be argued that while TOMS is having an impact and therefore influence on the cultures that they donate the shoes and have factories in they are in essence having a more influence on the American economic culture through the way in which they have revolutionized the way in which to build a business representative (Mendez20117). They did this through the way in which the company was created under the premise that sales equal the good done. Mycoskie said, we know every day that were going to give away one pair of shoes for every one we sell, and thats that. If we cant make the business work that way, then the business just doesnt work. Many small businesses have now started to model their practices after this one-for-one model however they have not been as roaring as TOMS especially if these companies are truly non-profit organizations (theworld.com). According to a debate Street Journal Toms is going a step further than most in blurring the difference between brand and almsgiving the brand doesnt exist outside the charitable work.Which helps explains why they have been so booming in selling their product because they are blurring those lines between the product brand and the charity aspect which often times is not the case when a major company wants to do charity work. Because of this blurring of the lines between corporate and charity this causes an influence in the United States corporate culture. Even though it may not be global in the sense that its an American company influencing the American slew world it still is a type of cultural imperialism. However according to Mazzarella cultural imperialism is the tool that is used to create chaos in which only the ad companies only have the upshot to. Again with the way in which TOMS places their imagery through social media sources there almost becomes an indirect way that they are trying to portray the good they are doing in the forefront while whatever other impacts they may be occu rring to the wayside so that it appears there is no influence created by TOMS and its industry both throughout the world and the United States local economy.Overall, TOMS shoe company is one that wants to bring good to those in need. However, there are several questions that arise such as if they are doing what they say they are why are their production facilities and practices so hidden? Or why dont they allow people to see just how much the difference in facilities in the United States and their factories in Argentina, Ethiopia and China? Lastly are they truly only having positive impacts to the local economies in which they donate their shoes or are they also having a negative one as well? The company is very open on the good they are doing and create a very powerful image that right away relates to the fetishism of their shoes with the consumer and their desire themselves to have a positive impact through their consumption of a product rather than guilt. As Mazzarella states th e global is constructed locally just as much as the local is constructed globally (200317).This can be seen through how with the local imagery that is created in the United States that is seen as a positive image of TOMS is directed to the rest of the world even though while it may appear very admittedly there are still many things about the overall corporation the TOMS company keeps hidden from the consumers eyes. This then is also how their cultural imperialistic impact is played through how the positive image is translated from the local to the global. Overall, TOMS offers a ascendent to short-term symptoms of poverty but does not address the root cause of poverty (Costello201212). In conclusion it index be better to buy a pair of shoes for half the price and then bring out a check for a foundation that support the local economies stem that TOMS is impacting so there can be more of a semipermanent impact rather than a short-term. However, there is a desire to create a positi ve impact and while there can never be a perfect model to create a business that is always creating a positive impact the TOMS company just might be on to something.Works CitedBartter, Jacqueline. A New Model of collective Social Responsibility. Iprs.uscs.edu. University of California, San Diego, 2012. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. http//irps.ucsd.edu/assets/001/503681.pdf Costello, Amy. Buy One and Give One, Inside TOMS clothe. Tiny Spark. Chronicle of Philanthropy. March, 15, 2012.F., Daniel. Toms One For the Movement. University of New Mexico, 2011. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. http//danielsethics.mgt.unm.edu/pdf/TOMS%20Case.pdf Marx, Karl, and David McLellan. Selected Writings. Oxford Eng. Oxford UP, 1977. Print. Mazzarella, William. Shoveling Smoke advertize and Globalization in Contemporary India. Durham Duke UP, 2003. Print. TOMS SHOES LOGO. TOMS Shoes & Eyewear official Store. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. International Labour Organization. International Labour Organization. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 4 Dec. 2012. TOMS Shoes Does Buy-One-Give-One Work? PRIs The World. PRIs The World RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2012. Www.TheWorld.com The Worlds family line Page. Www.TheWorld.com The Worlds Home Page. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2012.