Commonwealth V Golston

Javier Hipolito earth v. Golston, 366 NE 2d 744 - Mass: Supreme well-grounded Court 1977. About 2 P.M. on Sunday, August 24, 1975, the victim, a white man thirty-four years old, came out of a store in Dorchester and walked toward his car. Siegfried Golston, a black man of nineteen, walked rat him and hit him on the head with a baseball bat. The suspect then went into a building, changed his clothes, and crossed the street to the store, where he worked. When asked accordingly he had hit the man, he s countenance, For kicks. The victim was taken to a hospital. There a large portion of the scarer of his skull was outside to relieve pressure on his reason, and he voteless with the aid of an artificial respirator. Later the victim died. Golston was charged with put to death in first degree. There was evidence of great and bizarre emphasis in the act, which caused a 4 inch condense on the side of the skull. There is no requirement that the defendant know that his ac t was extremely atrocious or untamed which meat he had no mens rea. When asked why he did it he give tongue to for kicks. He has actus reus because he hit the victim with a baseball bat. The appellate court affirmed his conviction.  Among many separate errors, he claims that the death of the victim was not powerful established. They said that the exam judge correctly accepted the medical concept of brain death; alternatively, any error in this respect was blameless beyond a reasonable doubt. They likewise overrule the defendants other assignments of error. terra firma v. Pinnick, 354 Mass. 13, 15 n. 1 (1968). Commonwealth v. Vanetzian, 350 Mass. 491, 493 n. 1 (1966).Commonwealth v. Macloon,  one hundred one Mass. 1, 6 (1869). Commonwealth v. Parker, 2 Pick. 550, 558 (1824)If you want to get a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our pag e: write my paper