This assignment is on the pros and cons of the majority rules system in Australia.

legal age Rules Verdict A. Outline the minds that start forget to this law being changed. The quite a little Rules Verdict is in cause in a smattering of states in Australia. The main crusades for ever-changing the standard laws for jury Verdicts to Majority Rules, is that it is very expensive to observe 12 jurors penned up in a hotel for a fewer age to even weeks, wholly because ace person refuses to sum up with the stick. Another important reason is that the Majority Rules Verdict is slight time consuming and result allow for more cases to be heard. Also it is important that the jurors contribute get back to their natural lives, instead of days penned up in a hotel some a case. B.Discuss the effects (both constructive and negative) this law change entrust have on the community POSITIVE - superstar reason is to minimise the number of juries that hang. If your jury hangs, you feel you have slothful the courts time; emaciated money and more signifi give no ticetly wasted your own time. - Cases involving hung juries dont have to take many days to square up the problems. Thus, cases can be heard and a finding of particular can be a lot quicker if bulk rules verdict is used. - Majority rules verdict overcomes the problem of the rogue or perverse juror who refuses to listen to the other jurors or the evidence.

disconfirming -In idealistic circumstances, someone may be wrongly sentenced because of the mass rules verdict. Where the one person against the jury could have actually confident(p) the rest of the jury. -It upholds the requirement of proof beyond rational d oubt. Allowing a juror to dissent from a ver! dict of guilty authority that at least one juror had a reasonable doubt, which can create uncertainty in the conviction. C. Write a letter... If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper